Drawing for KNUCKLEHEAD

USPTO serial 78299780

KNUCKLEHEAD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 614
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
GRAY, CAROLYN
Law office
PETITIONS OFFICE

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KNUCKLEHEAD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Thomas Marquis

RICK STOHR STOHR DISTRIBUTION & MARKETING5303 BRISTOL WAY CTYAKIMA, WA 98908UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
028Sporting goods and fitness equipment, in-line skates, skis, snowboards, skateboards, bicycles, exercise machines, baby carrier hiking packs, joggers, strollers, juvenile toys and house products, fluid bottles, and bracketsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 29, 2005PETDPETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED—
Sep 7, 2005PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Jun 10, 2005PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Jun 10, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Feb 1, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 1, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 15, 2004MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Dec 14, 2004ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 30, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance