Drawing for LYSOL SUPERWIPES

USPTO serial 78300420

LYSOL SUPERWIPES

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BATTLE, KENNETH
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LYSOL SUPERWIPES?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Linda Heilman

LINDA HEILMAN RECKITT BENCKISER INC1655 VLY RDWAYNE, NJ 07470UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003All purpose cleaning preparations; general purpose cleaner with disinfecting properties; cleaning, polishing and scouring preparations for household, commercial, industrial and institutional use; oven cleaning preparations; stove-top cleaning preparations; cleaning preparations for vitroceramic surfaces; glass and metal cleaning preparations; window cleaning preparations; abrasive clothsACTIVE
005All purpose disinfecting preparations; disinfectant spray; sanitising preparations for household, commercial, industrial and institutional use; hand and surface sanitiser; germicides; deodorisers and sanitisers for bathrooms and toilets; room deodorisers; preparations for neutralising odoursACTIVE
021Scouring pads; sponges; toilet bowl brushes; cleaning cloths with disinfecting properties; cleaning wipes with disinfecting properties; Wipes, sponges, mops, cloths and pads for cleaning, and/or disinfecting hard surfacesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 9, 2005UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Oct 31, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 23, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 23, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 14, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 21, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 1, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 9, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 9, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 31, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 31, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance