USPTO serial 78301058
FERNWOOD
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VERHOSEK, WILLIAM T
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FERNWOOD?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Andrew J. Ferren
ANDREW J FERREN GOULSTON & STORRS PC400 ATLANTIC AVEBOSTON, MA 02110UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Financial investment consultation in the fields of securities, real estate and fine and decorative museum quality artwork | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 28, 2007 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 26, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |