USPTO serial 78301751
BLADELESS RAZOR
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Aug 15, 2006
- Examiner
- MILTON, PRISCILLA
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLADELESS RAZOR?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
Wayne, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
Wayne, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
Parsippany, NJ
Other trademarks owned by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Non-medicated toilet preparations, namely gels, creams and lotions relating to depilation; depilatories; depilatory waxes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
- Other trademarks owned by Reckitt & Colman (Overseas) Limited
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Similar marks named BLADELESS RAZOR
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 22, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Aug 29, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 28, 2006 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 15, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 18, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 27, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 20, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 20, 2004 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Mar 27, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |