USPTO serial 78302235
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Austin, TX, US
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
AUSTIN, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AUSTIN, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
Austin, TX, US
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY II, L.P.
AUSTIN, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
RENO, NV, US
Other trademarks owned by AT&T INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY I, L.P.
Austin, TX, US
Austin, TX, US
AUSTIN, TX, US
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David J. Cho
David J. Cho AT&T SERVICES, INC.208 S. Akard StreetDALLAS, TX 75202-4206UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 038 | Long distance telephone communication services | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 22, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 24, 2026 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 10, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 22, 2017 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 19, 2016 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Mar 19, 2016 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 13, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Feb 21, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 10, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 25, 2009 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 19, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 28, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 5, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 26, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2003 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |