USPTO serial 78302774
KELLY LE BROCK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with KELLY LE BROCK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Los Olivos, CA
Los Olivos, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Miriam Claire Beezy
MIRIAM CLAIRE BEEZY FOLEY & LARNDER LLP2029 CENTURY PARK E STE 3500LOS ANGELES, CA 90067UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, foundation, blush, lipstick, lip gloss, eye shadow, loose face powder, pressed face powder, eyeliners, eye pencils, lip pencils, mascara, makeup remover, nail polish, nail polish remover; face and body non-medicated lotions, creams, gels, and soaps; face and body moisturizers, cleansers, exfoliators, and toners; shaving creams and gels; body sprays and splashes; after shave gels, lotions, balms, and creams; eye creams and gels; non-medicated lip balm; bath oil, bath and shower gels, bath crystals, bubble bath, talcum powder, shampoo, hair conditioner, hair gel, hair spray; sun screen preparations, sun tanning preparations; perfumes and fragrances, namely, eau de toilette, colognes, cologne sprays, personal deodorant, scented dusting powders, antiperspirant; non-medicated toilet water; face and body masks, anti-wrinkle cream, professional skin care products, namely age spot and pigment lightening gels, exfoliation creams, non-medicated acne prone skin cleansing formulas and sun screen; hair coloring preparations; non-medicated massage oils; bath additives, namely, bath oils, bath beads, milk bath, bath crystals, bath tablets, bath herbs; bath gels; body emulsions; bath foam; body shampoos, shower gels, bath salts and bubble bath, all not for medical purposes; essential oils for personal use, cleaning and moisturizing facial packs; nail care preparations, nail polish, pumice stone, cotton sticks all for use on the body; scented room fragrances, scented body spray, potpourri, sachets, powdered cosmetic tissues and body scrubs; nonmedicated foot products, namely, foot creams and lotions, foot scrubs, foot masks, foot soaks, foot soaps, foot perfumes, foot sprays; home hygiene products, namely all purpose cleaning preparations, dish detergents, fabric cleaning preparations, and cleaning preparations for windows | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 11, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 9, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 5, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 22, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 27, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 14, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 8, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 2, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 2, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 11, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 5, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |