USPTO serial 78303024
OCEAN X
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HUGHITT, ELIZABETH
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OCEAN X?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
San Diego, CA
San Diego, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Richard K. Citron
RICHARD K CITRON CITRON & DEUTSCH10866 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 970LOS ANGELES, CA 90024UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Scuba diving and skin diving equipment, namely, diving masks, air tanks for divers, diving weights, diving snorkels, and diving vests | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, tops, jackets, pants, shorts, caps, skirts, dresses, swimwear and socks; and equipment used in water sports, namely, wetsuits | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 16, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 16, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 18, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 18, 2005 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 18, 2005 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 24, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | IROA | RESPONSE TO ITU OFFICE ACTION ENTERED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | INCD | ITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Mar 4, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 2, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 15, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 13, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 24, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |