Drawing for ALO-CELL-GEL

USPTO serial 78303029

ALO-CELL-GEL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
MCCAULEY, BRENDAN D
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ALO-CELL-GEL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Abelman

LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN, FRAYNE & SCHWAB150 E 42ND STNEW YORK, NY 10017-5612UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Pharmaceutical preparations for the treatment of skin irritation and for the enhancement of cell development; medicated skin care preparationsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 28, 2005EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Apr 28, 2005MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 28, 2005ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL
Apr 28, 2005EXFBEXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF
Dec 16, 2004RECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED
Dec 16, 2004CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED
Dec 9, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 24, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2004EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Nov 19, 2004JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Nov 19, 2004EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB
Jul 22, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 14, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 9, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance