Drawing for PST DENTAL PULSED SIGNAL THERAPY TECHNOLOGY

USPTO serial 78303382

PST DENTAL PULSED SIGNAL THERAPY TECHNOLOGY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PST DENTAL PULSED SIGNAL THERAPY TECHNOLOGY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU, PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Scientific, surveying, measuring, signaling, checking, supervision and electrical apparatus and instruments namely, magnetic therapy implements, namely, magnetometers, Hall-effect Gauss meters and oscilloscopes for measuring magnetic fields, magnetic coils, magnetic field generators other than for medical use; pre-recorded magnetic data-carriers and recording discs which contain teaching material, information material relative to magnetic therapy and software used to diagnose and treat orthopedic, cartilage and connective tissue diseases and conditions, as well as paradontosis and jaw joint arthritis, for use in the field of magnetic therapyACTIVE
010Surgical, medical, dental and veterinary apparatus and instruments, namely apparatus, instruments and implements for treatment with magnetic therapy; artificial teeth; artificial limbs; orthopedic articles, namely, belts, braces, orthopedic footwear, joint implants, soles, support bandages, supports; suturesACTIVE
016Printed information, namely, newsletters, brochures, magazines, manuals, and instructional, and teaching material in the field of magnetic therapy treatment of diseases and ailments; photographsACTIVE
042Scientific research in the field of orthopedic, cartilage and connective tissue diseases and ailments, paradontosis and jaw joint arthrosis, and the diagnosis and treatment thereof, all in the field of magnetic therapy, but not in relation to dental root and gum treatments; design and development of computer hardware and software; all relative to the field of magnetic therapy but not dental root and gum treatmentsACTIVE
044Dental services, except for dental root and gum treatments; medical services namely, magnetic therapy treatmentACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 14, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Feb 14, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 19, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 18, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jul 6, 2006PBMRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MANAGING ATTORNEY REQUEST
Jun 16, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 2, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
May 24, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 24, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 24, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
May 18, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Apr 17, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 17, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 17, 2005CRMLCORRESPONDENCE MAILED
Oct 17, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Oct 17, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Sep 23, 2005PBCRWITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY
Jul 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jun 11, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jun 6, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jan 11, 2005CPEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Jan 11, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Dec 3, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 29, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 26, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 19, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 19, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 19, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 16, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 15, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 9, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Nov 8, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Nov 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 8, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Nov 1, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 20, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 20, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Apr 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 12, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 11, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 11, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Nov 10, 2003AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Nov 10, 2003CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 10, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance