Drawing for W. SCHILLIG WORLD OF COMFORT

USPTO serial 78303944

W. SCHILLIG WORLD OF COMFORT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BUTLER, MIDGE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with W. SCHILLIG WORLD OF COMFORT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kevin S. Lemack

KEVIN S LEMACK NIELDS & LEMACKSTE 7176 E MAIN STWESTBOROUGH, MA 01581

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather and imitation leather sold in bulkACTIVE
020Fitted leather and imitation leather covers for furniture, headrests for furniture, furniture, upholstered furniture, seating furniture, sofas, armchairs, mattresses and cushionsACTIVE
024Fabrics, namely, vinyl and textile fabrics for use in the manufacture of headrests for furniture, furniture, upholstered furniture, seating furniture, sofas, arm chairs, mattresses, cushions and stoolsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 29, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED
Mar 29, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 29, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 25, 2006CORVREVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE
Jul 18, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 25, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Apr 5, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Feb 3, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jan 23, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 23, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Jan 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jan 9, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Jan 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Jan 4, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jan 4, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jul 13, 2005CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED
Jul 12, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Jun 22, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED
Jun 22, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY
Jun 16, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jun 1, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 14, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 11, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Dec 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 3, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Nov 19, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Nov 18, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Nov 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Nov 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
May 13, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance