Drawing for SO SUSAN

USPTO serial 78304074

SO SUSAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHANOSKI, JOANNA MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SO SUSAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Eye makeup; eye pencils; eye shadow; eyeliners; blush; rouge; concealers; face creams; face powder; facial cleansers; facial creams; facial emulsions; facial makeup; facial masks; facial scrubs; facial lotions; facial mousses; skin lotions, creams, mousses, oils, and gels; non-medicated lip balms; essential oils for personal use; artificial eyelashesACTIVE
004Scented candlesACTIVE
008Nail clippers; eyelash curlers; nail rippers; electric nail buffersACTIVE
021Cosmetic brushes; facial sponges for applying make-up and body powder; powder puffsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jun 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 11, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 20, 2005NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE
Jun 9, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED
Jun 9, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED
Jun 9, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 28, 2005IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED
Mar 25, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 28, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 6, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 16, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
May 6, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Apr 23, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Apr 23, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 14, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 14, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance