USPTO serial 78304190
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
MELRSOE, WI
MELRSOE, WI
Melrose, WI
Melrose, WI
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Athletic sporting goods, namely, baseball equipment, namely, baseball leg guards, baseball gloves, baseball masks, baseball body protectors and baseball umpire body protectors; softball equipment, namely, softball masks, softball leg guards, softball body protectors, girls softball masks, girls softball leg guards, and girls softball body protectors; football equipment, namely, football shoulder pads, shoulder and arm braces, football injury protective pads, football thigh guards, football knee pads, football elbow pads, football knee braces, football hip pads, football blocking pads and football shin guards; hockey equipment, namely, hockey shoulder pads, hockey hip pads, hockey leg guards, and hockey gloves; basketball equipment, namely, basketball knee pads; soccer equipment, namely, soccer leg guards and soccer injury protective pads; horseshoes for recreational purposes; and athletic and gymnastic equipment, namely, padding for walls | SECTION 18 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2007 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19, 2009 | C18. | CANCELLED SECTION 18-TOTAL | — |
| Mar 19, 2009 | CANT | CANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 25, 2009 | CANG | CANCELLATION GRANTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 13, 2008 | PETC | CANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 9, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 1, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 1, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 24, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 13, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 25, 2007 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 16, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Mar 14, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 29, 2006 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Dec 17, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 30, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 18, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 16, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Aug 16, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 24, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 4, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 1, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 30, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 11, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 12, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 11, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |