Drawing for SEAL SURPRISE

USPTO serial 78304318

SEAL SURPRISE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
SHARPER JR, SAM
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SEAL SURPRISE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian H. Batzli

BRIAN H BATZLI MERCHANT & GOULD, PCPO BOX 2910MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55402-0910UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Labels not of textile namely, adhesive paper labels, printed paper labels, adhesive printed paper labels, paper labels, self-adhesive paper labels, paper tag labels; packaging materials and parts of packaging materials namely resealable paper packaging labels; plastic packaging namely plastic packs for packaging, plastic bubble packs for packaging, plastic bags for packaging, plastic pouches for packaging and plastic envelopes for packaging; and paper packaging namely paper packs for packaging, paper bags for packaging, paper pouches for packaging and paper envelopes for packagingACTIVE
017(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Adhesive-backed plastic films for use in the manufacture of labels; adhesive sealants for general packaging useACTIVE
020(Based on Intent to Use) (Based on 44(d) Priority Application) Plastic labelsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 5, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 5, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 25, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 13, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Jun 1, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 31, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 8, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 7, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 28, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Oct 19, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Oct 19, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Oct 2, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Sep 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 17, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 4, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 3, 2003MAILPAPER RECEIVED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance