USPTO serial 78304488
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
35530 Noyal-Sur-Vilaine, FR
35530 Noyal-Sur-Vilaine, FR
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Scott S. Havlick
SCOTT S HAVLICK HOLLAND & HART LLPPO BOX 8749555 - 17TH ST STE 3200DENVER, CO 80201-8749| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat substitutes made with soya proteins; vegetable salads containing soya; salad oils containing soya; unfrozen and frozen prepared dishes containing soya and meat, poultry or fish | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Sauces containing soya; soya flour; processed cereals containing soya; bread containing soya; pastries containing soya; confectionery, namely chocolate bars and sweetened cereal bars containing soya; edible ices containing soya; ice cream, ice milk and frozen yogurt containing soya; salad dressings containing soya; unfrozen and frozen prepared dishes containing soya and rice or pasta | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Nonalcoholic soya-based beverages and fruit drinks; concentrates, syrups and powders containing soya used in the preparation of soft drinks | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 28, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 8, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 21, 2004 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 15, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |