USPTO serial 78308686
NATURELAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- STIGLITZ, SUSAN R
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with NATURELAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Meat, fish, poultry and game; meat extracts; preserved, dried and cooked fruits and vegetables; jellies, jams, fruit and vegetable preserves and sauces; cream milk, milk based beverages containing coffee, dairy based chocolate food beverages, yogurt, yogurt based beverages containing coffee edible oils and fats; salad dressings;cream, nuts, peanut butter, cheeses, roasted and flavored nuts; processed beans | ACTIVE | May 1, 1998 |
| 030 | Coffee, tea, cocoa, sugar, rice, tapioca, sago, flour and breakfast cereal, cereal based snack foods, bread, pastry and candy, flavored ices; honey, treacle; yeast, baking-powder; salt, edible salt, mustard; vinegar, spices; non-alcoholic coffee based beverages, non-alcoholic tea based beverages, cocoa, in particular food flavorings; confectionery, chewing gums, chocolate, chocolate pralines with liqueur fillings; chocolate candy mixtures containing alcohol; muesli, fruit, chocolate candy bars and ready to eat chocolate based food bars, mustard, ketchup | ACTIVE | May 1, 1998 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 26, 2004 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Nov 26, 2004 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2003 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |