USPTO serial 78319597
BLEDINA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3311647Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 16, 2007
- Examiner
- CROSS, TRACY L
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with BLEDINA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Villefranche sur Saone, FR
69400 VILLEFRANCHE SUR SAONE, FR
69400 VILLEFRANCHE SUR SAONE, FR
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ann K. Ford
Ann K. Ford DLA Piper LLP (US)500 Eighth Street, NWWashington, DC 20004UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Pharmaceutical preparations for digestion purposes, lacteal flours for pharmaceutical purposes, lactic fermenting agents for pharmaceutical purposes; baby food, namely, baby cereals, soups, dehydrated soups, milk, powdered milk, stewed fruit, vegetable purees, dehydrated vegetable purees, fruit and vegetable juice, mashed food | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 029 | Meat, fish, [ ham, ] poultry, game, [ cut meats in particular for appetizers; ] dried, preserved and cooked fruit and vegetables, stewed fruit; jam, fruit purées, [ jelly; soups; canned food primarily made of meat, fish, ham, poultry and game; prepared, dried, cooked, canned, frozen dishes, primarily made of meat, fish, ham, poultry and game; appetizers made of fruits or vegetables, namely, potato, flavored or natural potato chips, dried fruit mix and prepared oleaginous nuts, namely, peanuts and cashew nuts; oleaginous products, namely, prepared nuts, hazelnuts, peanuts, cashew nuts; mini cooked meats as appetizers; ] milk, milk powder, gelled, flavored and whipped milk, fresh cream, butter, cheese spreads, cheeses, ripened cheeses, ripened cheeses with mould, unmatured fresh cheeses and cheeses in brine, cottage cheese, fresh cheeses sold either liquid or in paste; plain or flavored beverages composed mainly of milk or milk products, namely, milk-based beverage containing coffee; milky beverages mainly made of milk, milky [ beverages comprising fruit; fermented ] plain or flavored milky products, namely, yogurts, yogurt based beverages | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
| 030 | Milk products, namely, milky desserts, mousses, ice creams, dessert creams; [ coffee-based beverage containing milk; ] milk shakes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Bledina S.A.
- Other trademarks owned by BLEDINA
- Other trademarks owned by BLEDINA
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named BLEDINA
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 23, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 23, 2013 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 23, 2013 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 29, 2008 | COC. | CORRECTION UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 16, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jul 31, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 11, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 13, 2007 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 2, 2007 | PCBG | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - GRANTED | — |
| Apr 26, 2007 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PDCB | PETITION TO DIRECTOR - CHANGE BASIS - RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 23, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 6, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Sep 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Mar 29, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 9, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 26, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 28, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 28, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |