USPTO serial 78320013
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Compagnie des Vins de Bordeaux et de La Gironde Dourthe-Kressmann
33290 Parempuyre, FR
Other trademarks owned by Compagnie des Vins de Bordeaux et de La Gironde Dourthe-Kressmann
Compagnie des Vins de Bordeaux et de La Gironde Dourthe-Kressmann
33290 Parempuyre, FR
Other trademarks owned by Compagnie des Vins de Bordeaux et de La Gironde Dourthe-Kressmann
Compagnie des Vins de Bordeaux et de La Gironde Dourthe-Kressmann
33290 Parempuyre, FR
Other trademarks owned by Compagnie des Vins de Bordeaux et de La Gironde Dourthe-Kressmann
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Patricia A. Wilczynski Brozek
Patricia A. Wilczynski Brozek Wilczynski Brozek LawP.O. Box 183040 Preston StHUNTINGTON, NY 11743| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 033 | Alcoholic beverages, namely wines | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 19, 2025 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 7, 2024 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 11, 2015 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jun 11, 2015 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| May 21, 2015 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Jul 15, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 6, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 7, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 28, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 22, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 17, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 21, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |