CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MASS DISTRACTION

USPTO serial 78322577

MASS DISTRACTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
STRZYZ, KAREN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASS DISTRACTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Tsan Abrahamson, Katherine C. Spelman, Sophie Cohen, Deborah Davis Han, Lara Kehoe Hoffman

TSAN ABRAHAMSON COBALT LLP819 BANCROFT WAYBERKELEY, CA 94710UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025Clothing, namely, shirts, jackets, ties and pantsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 20, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 20, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 28, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 25, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
May 25, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 22, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Dec 6, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Nov 29, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Nov 29, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 30, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Apr 13, 2006NEWNNEW NOA TO ISSUE—
Apr 10, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 10, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Apr 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Apr 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Mar 27, 2006IUCNNOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED—
Sep 27, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 5, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jun 15, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Apr 5, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Apr 5, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 20, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 10, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Mar 7, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Mar 7, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jul 27, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jun 17, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 17, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jun 11, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jun 11, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 28, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 22, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 1, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance