CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for EHC

USPTO serial 78323688

EHC

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3351925Status 800Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Dec 11, 2007
Examiner
GARTNER, JOHN M
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection. Calendar the next Section 8 and 9 deadline in 10 years and maintain monitoring.

Status 800: Status 800 means the registration was renewed after acceptable combined Section 8 and Section 9 filings. The mark remains registered for another 10-year term with active federal protection.

Need help with EHC?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Susan B. Flohr

Susan B. Flohr BLANK ROME LLP1825 Eye Street NWWASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
001Chemical preparations, namely, degradation agents for the decontamination of soil, sediment, sludge or waterACTIVE—
040[ Consulting services relating to decontamination of soil, sediment, sludge and water ]SECTION 8 - CANCELLED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 12, 2020ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Dec 7, 2017NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED—
Dec 7, 2017RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Dec 7, 201789AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Dec 7, 2017APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 9, 2017E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Dec 11, 2016REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Jul 26, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 11, 2015ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 7, 2014ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 7, 2014REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 12, 2014ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Nov 30, 2013NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 30, 2013C15PREGISTERED - PARTIAL SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Nov 30, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Nov 20, 2013815FREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED—
Nov 20, 2013E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Nov 20, 2013ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 20, 2013REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 27, 2013ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Dec 11, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Sep 25, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 5, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 17, 2007PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Aug 17, 2007CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Aug 17, 2007XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Aug 17, 2007GNENNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2007GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Aug 17, 2007CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Aug 7, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Aug 7, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Aug 2, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 2, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 25, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 25, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 22, 2007TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 22, 2007CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 21, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 15, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 15, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 15, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 3, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
May 3, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Oct 5, 2006GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Oct 5, 2006CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Sep 5, 2006RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Feb 20, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Feb 20, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Feb 18, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 7, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 7, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 7, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 7, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 5, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 5, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jun 3, 2005WOAGWITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED—
Jun 3, 2005WOARTEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED—
Jun 1, 2005GNSIINQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jun 1, 2005CNSISUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN—
Dec 1, 2004GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Dec 1, 2004CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Nov 27, 2004TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 24, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 24, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 26, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 2, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance