Drawing for CONDOMTOY CONDOM

USPTO serial 78331176

CONDOMTOY CONDOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CORWIN, CHARLOTTE K
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CONDOMTOY CONDOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark D. Schneider

MARK D SCHNEIDER GIFFORD, KRASS, GROH, SPRINKLE, ANDERSONPO BOX 70212701 TROY CTR DR STE 330TROY, MI 48007-7021

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
010condomACTIVEJan 31, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 9, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 8, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 22, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 21, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Oct 18, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Oct 18, 2006CNESSU - EXAMINER STATEMENT - WRITTEN—
Sep 28, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 23, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 21, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 27, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jun 26, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jun 16, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Jun 8, 2006CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
May 11, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
May 8, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 8, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 6, 2006CNCFCONTINUATION OF FINAL REFUSAL MAILED—
Apr 5, 2006CNCFSU - ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - WRITTEN—
Mar 2, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Feb 23, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 23, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Dec 16, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 15, 2005CNFRSU - FINAL REFUSAL - WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
May 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 11, 2005CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 3, 2005SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 13, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Apr 13, 2005EISUTEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVEDThe applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action.
Nov 23, 2004NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 31, 2004PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 11, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 22, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 22, 2004CNEAEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jun 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance