USPTO serial 78332939
MESSER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 28, 2006
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This registration is in, or will soon enter, a USPTO maintenance window. Missing a Section 8 or Section 9 filing can cancel the registration.
Need help with MESSER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Get help with this Renewal, set up monitoring, or talk with CopyMark.
Get Attorney Assistance for just $299*
Plus Government fees of $650
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Menomonee Falls, WV
MESSER TRADEMARK GMBH & CO. KG
BAD SODEN, DE
Bad Soden am Taunus, DE
BAD SODEN AM TAUNUS, DE
SULZBACH, DE
SULZBACH, DE
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Emily M. Chilson
Emily M. Chilson Andrus Intellectual Property Law, LLP100 EAST WISCONSIN AVENUESuite 1100MILWAUKEE, WI 53202Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal powders for use in the cutting and welding industry; weld filler materials; namely, welding rods, soldering and brazing rods | ACTIVE | Feb 28, 1997 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MG Systems & Welding, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by MESSER TRADEMARK GMBH & CO. KG
- Other trademarks owned by MESSER GROUP GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MESSER SE & CO. KGAA
- Other trademarks owned by MESSER GROUP GMBH
- Other trademarks owned by MESSER GROUP GMBH
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Similar marks named MESSER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 28, 2025 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 24, 2024 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Nov 24, 2021 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 14, 2017 | PRA7 | REGISTERED - SEC. 7 REQUEST ABANDONED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | NA89 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2017 | RNL1 | REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS) | The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | 89AG | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTED | The USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary. |
| Jan 5, 2017 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 25, 2016 | E89R | TEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 12, 2014 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Aug 23, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Aug 14, 2014 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - MAILED | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Mar 7, 2012 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jan 17, 2012 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 12, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 26, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 25, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 12, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 9, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| May 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 13, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 28, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 6, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 23, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |