Drawing for ZINULLOSE

USPTO serial 78335801

ZINULLOSE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
JACKSON, STEVEN W
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ZINULLOSE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Charles F. Hauff, Jr.

Charles F. Hauff, Jr. SNELL & WILMER L.L.P.ONE ARIZONA CENTER400 E. VAN BURENPHOENIX, AZ 85004

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Over-the-counter pharmaceutical and homeopathic preparations for the relief of cold and allergy symptomsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 23, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 23, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 18, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Aug 18, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Aug 18, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 12, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Feb 12, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Feb 12, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 7, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Aug 7, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Aug 7, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
May 23, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Feb 20, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Feb 20, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Oct 2, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Aug 17, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Aug 17, 2006FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Feb 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Nov 29, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 9, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 12, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Sep 29, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Sep 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 12, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 12, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 9, 2005REINREINSTATED
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 9, 2005ZZZYPREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN
Feb 18, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jul 12, 2004EMRVEMAIL RECEIVED
Jul 9, 2004DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED
Jun 28, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 17, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Mar 1, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Mar 1, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 1, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Dec 29, 2003NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance