USPTO serial 78336928
ENPATH MEDICAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3261870Status 711
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- SAPPENFIELD, ANN
- Law office
- POST REGISTRATION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with ENPATH MEDICAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
BLAINE, MN
CLARENCE, NY
Plymouth, MN
Plymouth, MN
PLYMOUTH, MN
PLYMOUTH, MN
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael F. Scalise
Michael F. Scalise Greatbatch, Inc.10000 Wehrle DriveClarence, NY 14031UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 010 | Percutaneous and venous vessel introducers for use in implanting pacing leads, central venous catheters, infusion catheters and ports and associated parts thereof; biomedical devices for use in arterial, vascular, transthoracic and pericardial surgery or medical procedures; hemo-dialysis catheters, including center-line retractable safety needles and associated parts thereof | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2004 |
| 035 | Business marketing consulting services for percutaneous and venous vessel introducers, catheters and safety needles, for others | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2004 |
| 040 | Contract manufacturing of for percutaneous and venous vessel introducers, catheters and safety needles, for others | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2004 |
| 042 | Research and development, design, testing and consulting services to obtain regulatory approval for percutaneous and venous vessel introducers, catheters and safety needles, for others | SECTION 7(e) - CANCELLED | Jul 31, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by QUAN EMERTEQ CORP.
- Other trademarks owned by GREATBATCH INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENPATH MEDICAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENPATH MEDICAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by ENPATH MEDICAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by MEDAMICUS, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 010
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named ENPATH MEDICAL
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 18, 2010 | C7.. | CANCELLED SECTION 7-TOTAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | C7RF | REQUEST FOR SECT 7 TOTAL SURRENDER FILED | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 26, 2010 | ES7S | TEAS SECTION 7 SURRENDER RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 24, 2010 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jan 14, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 14, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 6, 2009 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jul 23, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jun 6, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 16, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 27, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jul 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 7, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 12, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 6, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 31, 2003 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |