Drawing for ROCKET MAN

USPTO serial 78337574

ROCKET MAN

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
EULIN, INGRID C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROCKET MAN?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Jordan E. Olivetti

Jordan E. Olivetti Meitus Gelbert Rose LLP47 S. MeridianSuite 400Indianapolis, IN 46204

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
025clothing, namely, shirts, t-shirts, sweatshirts, pants, shorts, jerseys, jackets, sweaters, footwear, belts, caps, headbands, wristbands, socks, underwear, suits, neckties, scarves, gloves, pajamas and robesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 30, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 30, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 11, 2008EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Aug 11, 2008EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Aug 11, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Feb 26, 2008EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Feb 26, 2008EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Feb 26, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Sep 27, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Sep 12, 2007UNDNUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - NO ACTION TAKEN
Aug 28, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jun 6, 2007OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999
Jun 5, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999
May 31, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Dec 21, 2005OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999
Dec 21, 2005OPPFOPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB
Oct 4, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 14, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jun 20, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jun 10, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 13, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
May 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
May 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 1, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 31, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 17, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 17, 2004MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Aug 23, 2004TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jun 27, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 3, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED
Feb 3, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Feb 3, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED
Jan 2, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance