USPTO serial 78338597
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gregory Rutchik
GREGORY ALAN RUTCHIK LINER YANKELEVITZ SUNSHINE & REGENSTREIF199 FREMONT ST 20TH FLSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2255UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 025 | Clothing, namely, baby T-shirts, pants, sweaters, dresses, socks, hats, bodysuits, jackets, sweatshirts, rompers, shoes, layettes, one-piece infant underwear, rompers, bodysuits, hats, headbands, scarves, booties, socks, mittens, burp clothes, namely, shirts, pants, t-shirts and coveralls; children's T-shirts, pants, sweaters, dresses, skirts, bodysuits, jackets, sweatshirts, sweat pants, hats, headbands, tights, scarves, shoes, belts | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2003 |
| 035 | Retail store services featuring baby and children's clothes, namely, T- shirts, pants, sweaters, dresses, socks, hats, bodysuits, jackets, sweatshirts, rompers, shoes, layette; baby and children's accessories, namely, hats, headbands, sun glasses, tights, scarves, hair clips, shoes, belts, toys, diaper bags, gift cards, plush toys | ABANDONED | Feb 1, 2003 |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 21, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Sep 21, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 21, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 13, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 31, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 22, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 18, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jul 1, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| May 23, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| May 17, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 14, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| May 14, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 11, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| May 6, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 17, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 1, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 4, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 7, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |