USPTO serial 78343590
MW MICHELE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MW MICHELE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Molly Buck Richard
MOLLY BUCK RICHARD RICHARD LAW GROUP8411 PRESTON RD STE 890DALLAS, TN 75225UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | Jewelry made of precious metal or coated therewith, ; costume jewelry; watch fobs, bands, straps, bracelets and chains | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order services and online retail store services featuring glasses, sunglasses, jewelry, watches, clocks, luggage and leather accessories | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Tempus International Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Tempus International Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by Fossil, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named MW MICHELE
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 9, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 9, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 5, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 14, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 25, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 2, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 7, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 24, 2005 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Aug 24, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 6, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 24, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| May 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 5, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 3, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 13, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 12, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 12, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 8, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |