USPTO serial 78349189
WOW FACTORY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KEAM, ALEX S
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with WOW FACTORY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
GMAC COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT
NEW YORK, NY
Other trademarks owned by GMAC COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT
NATURAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, LTD
FARMINGDALE, NY
FARMINGDALE, NY
FARMINGDALE, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sanford Frank
Sanford Frank Law Office of Sanford Frank151 Kettles LaneMedford, NY 11763UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Board, parlor, party, and role-playing games; card games; toy craft and activity sets for use by children for conducting science experiments, for making candies and artificial flowers, for decorating home articles, for making and decorating stationery, leather, yarn and fabric articles; jigsaw puzzles; toy vehicles; toy action figures, and accessories for use therewith; dolls, doll clothing, doll playsets, and doll accessories; children's and infant's multiple activity toys; plush toys; stuffed toys; plastic and vinyl toy characters and toy animals; toy figures; ride-on toys; push toys; pull toys; radio-controlled toy vehicles; mechanical toys; toy construction sets, building toys, namely blocks and beam and girder sets; wind-up toys; water squirting toys; musical toys; inflatable toys; infant toy rattles; equipment sold as a unit for playing board, parlor, skill and action, card, and role-playing games; toy sporting equipment, namely footballs, baseballs, baseball bats, hockey sticks and pucks, soccer balls, basketballs, volleyballs, foam disc and ball shooters and foam toy discs and balls for use therewith; balloons; toy bakeware, kitchenware and cookware; yo-yos; toy banks; bath toys; toy airplanes, boats and cars and construction models thereof; bean bags; toy building blocks; music box toys; Christmas tree ornaments; flying discs party favors in the nature of small toys; jump ropes; kites; puppets; collectable toy figures; talking toys; coin-operated arcade games, plastic toy hoops, and pinwheels | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GMAC COMMERCIAL FINANCE LLC, AS AGENT
- Other trademarks owned by NATURAL SCIENCE INDUSTRIES, LTD
- Other trademarks owned by NSI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by NSI INTERNATIONAL, INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named WOW FACTORY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 7, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 7, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 30, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 17, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Aug 15, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 26, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 26, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 6, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jul 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 10, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 10, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 30, 2006 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 30, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 9, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 9, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 23, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 6, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 23, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 13, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |