USPTO serial 78358347
PWT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FLETCHER, TRACY L
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PWT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Grant R. Clayton
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 008 | Hand tools and implements, namely, hot air and thermal wedge joiners for joining acrylic, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyphenylene, polystyrene, poly tetra fluoroethene and poly vinyl chloride membranes; extruders, namely, hand held extruders for use with acrylic, acrylonitrile butadiene styrene, polyamide, polycarbonate, polyethylene, polypropylene, polyphenylene, polystyrene, poly tetra fluoroethene and polyvinyl chloride materials, namely, membranes, panels and sheets, and parts and accessories for all of the foregoing sold as a unit for use by construction and engineering professionals | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Welding Technologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Plastic Welding Technologies International, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 008
- Similar marks named PWT
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2013 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2013 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 17, 2012 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 16, 2012 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2012 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2012 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2011 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 13, 2011 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 7, 2011 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 6, 2011 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Sep 2, 2010 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 1, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 28, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 23, 2010 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 12, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 28, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 28, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 1, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jul 17, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 10, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2008 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 3, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 29, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 6, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 24, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 16, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 13, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| May 12, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 12, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 21, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 5, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 1, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 12, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 5, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 4, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Mar 2, 2004 | PCGR | PETITION TO DIRECTOR GRANTED | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |
| Feb 4, 2004 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |