USPTO serial 78358416
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel Park
CHRISTENSEN MILLER, ET AL10250 CONSTELLATION BL 19TH FLLOS ANGELES, CA 90067| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Women's cosmetics; women's cosmetics, namely, perfume, lipstick, lip liner pencil, eyeliner pencil, liquid eyeliner, eyebrow pencil, eyeshadow pencil, liquid lip liner, mascara, lip gloss, nail polish, blush, powder blush, eye shadow, liquid foundation, lipstick pencil, body lotion, scented body spray, body glitter, shower gel, facial powder, skin moisturizer, facial lotion, nail hardener, glitter liner, foaming face cleanser, cream face cleanser, facial cream, facial moisturizer, essential oils for personal use, skin toner, eye cream, lip balm, eye make up remover, facial scrub, facial pack in the nature of a facial beauty mask, body scrub, and body pack in the nature of a beauty mask for the body | ABANDONED | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 1, 2005 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 1, 2005 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 12, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jul 7, 2005 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| May 31, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 11, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 24, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 4, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 18, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |