USPTO serial 78358753
ELEGANZA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3008590Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 25, 2005
- Examiner
- CHISOLM, KEVON
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with ELEGANZA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Las Vegas, NV
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew Powelson
Matthew Powelson 321 Law, Inc.P.O. BOX 911MONTEREY, CA 93942UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | [ Electrical and electromagnetic signal transmitting amplifying, receiving and converting devices, namely, cables, wires, connectors, and control devices, namely, remote controls for use with electrical, electronic and computer devices, namely, personal computers; ] loudspeakers [ ; stereo amplifiers; audio equipment and accessories, namely, audio cables, audio wires and audio connectors; video equipment and accessories, namely, video cables, video wires and video connectors; electronic game equipment and accessories, namely, game cables and game connectors; electrical power control components, namely, voltage surge suppressors; energy conditioning devices, namely, power noise reduction devices; voltage stabilizers ] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Sep 5, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 27, 2016 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 2, 2011 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Oct 27, 2011 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| May 4, 2009 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 12, 2007 | PLGL | ASSIGNED TO PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | AMD7 | SEC 7 REQUEST FILED | — |
| Jun 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 25, 2005 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 2, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 13, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 17, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 15, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 4, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Aug 25, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 19, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jul 29, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |