USPTO serial 78360389
CHISHOLM
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- YARD, JOHN S
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CHISHOLM?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
ERIK M PELTON
ERIK M PELTON ERIK M PELTON, ATTORNEY AT LAWPO BOX 100637ARLINGTON, VA 22210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 034 | Smokeless Tobacco | ACTIVE | Jan 26, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2006 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Dec 11, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | EXPA | EX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | GNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2006 | CNES | EXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 8, 2005 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 16, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |