USPTO serial 78364610
MOISTURE-CONTOURING
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MARTIN, EUGENIA K
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 114
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with MOISTURE-CONTOURING?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Howard N. Aronson
HOWARD N ARONSON LACKENBACH SIEGEL LLPPO BOX 416SCARSDALE, NY 10583UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | NON-MEDICATED SKIN CARE PREPARATIONS; HAIR CARE PREPARATIONS; BODY CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BODY SOAPS, BODY CREAMS, BODY LOTIONS, BODY POWDERS, NON-MEDICATED DEODORANTS AND ANTI-PERSPIRANTS; SUNCARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, SUNSCREEN, SUN BLOCK AND SUN TANNING PREPARATIONS; PREPARATIONS TO PROTECT THE SKIN FROM THE SUN; NAMELY, SUN CREAMS AND AFTER-SUN LOTIONS; BATH PRODUCTS, NAMELY, BATH BEADS, BATH FOAM, BATH GELS, BATH LOTION, BATH OIL, BATH POWDER, AND NON-MEDICATED BATH SALTS; PERFUME, COLOGNE, COSMETICS AND MAKEUP | ACTIVE | Oct 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 26, 2005 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| May 26, 2005 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| May 25, 2005 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 7, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 7, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 10, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 28, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Oct 21, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 14, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |