USPTO serial 78364713
RED BRICK REALTY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MURRAY, DAVID T
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RED BRICK REALTY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark A. Winsor
MARK A WINSOR WINSOR LAW FIRM PLC1201 S ALMA SCHOOL RD STE 11100MESA, AZ 85210UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 036 | Real estate brokerage | ACTIVE | Apr 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 17, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 6, 2005 | UNDC | UNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED | — |
| Jul 6, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 27, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Sep 21, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 27, 2004 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| May 27, 2004 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |