USPTO serial 78364886
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVENEW YORK, NY 10017-5621UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Telecommunications, data communications and data acquisition installations, apparatus and instruments, namely, electronic, facsimile, telegram and teletypewriter machines, telephones, radio pagers for processing, logging, storing, transmitting, displaying, receiving, input, output or print-outs of non-pictorial or graphical data; apparatus for recording, transmitting and reproducing sounds or images, namely, video recorders, radio transmitters, telecommunications transmitters; mobile phones, blank CD ROMS, blank floppy discs; blank discs, tapes and wires for use as magnetic data carriers; blank magnetic tapes for use with audio or visual signals; blank reading discs, video display units, digital video discs featuring movies, television programs, sporting events, travel and tourism, fashion, food and drink, wine, cooking instruction, self-improvement, health, women's issues, Internet related information, child raising, fiction and non-fiction books, comics, audio-video products, automobiles, home improvement and current affairs; digital optical transmission apparatus and instruments, namely, videophones; laser apparatus and instruments, namely, laser printers, laser writers and laser scanners; apparatus for viewing electronic images recorded by electronic cameras, namely, transmitters, modems, receivers and monitors; facsimile telegraph; telecommunications apparatus, namely, modems to enable connection to databases and the Internet; wireless telecommunications apparatus, namely, antennas, converters and amplifiers; all of the aforesaid excluding computer programs | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Printed matter, namely, magazines, fiction and non-fiction books and newspapers in the fields of movies, television programs, sporting events, travel and tourism, fashion, food and drink, wine, cooking instruction, self-improvement, health,women's issues, Internet related information, child raising, fiction and non-fiction books, comics, audio-video products, automobiles, home improvement and current affairs | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Advertising, information and promotion services, namely, promoting the goods and services of others; providing electronic commerce services, namely, providing information products via online computer databases or the Internet for advertising and sales purposes; compiling advertisements of others for use as web pages on the Internet, namely, providing web sites with advertisements for the goods and services of others on a global computer network; all of the aforesaid excluding management and consulting services | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Providing information services relating to finance and insurance via on-line computer databases or the Internet | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | Providing information relating to the repair and/or installation of telecommunications and wireless communications apparatuses, namely, laser apparatus, electronic cameras, audio and video recorders | ACTIVE | — |
| 038 | Providing telecommunications services through facsimile, teletypewriter, telegraph, telephone, telegram, and message collection transmission services via online computer databases or the Internet; transmitting data and information by electronic, computer, cable, radio, radio paging, teleprinter, teleletter, electronic mail, fax machine, television, microwave, laser beam, or communications satellite; consulting services relating to data communications, namely, providing telecommunications equipment user information to others; telecommunications services, namely, providing data transmission and reception services via radio, satellite and cable network systems; video text and teletext transmission services; radio and television broadcasting of programs; renting of telecommunications apparatuses, namely, transmitters, receivers, antennas, facsimile machines, telephones; time sharing services for telecommunications apparatuses; transmitting information in the nature of web pages, and data by electronic communications networks; electronic mail services; providing others the telecommunications access and links to computer databases and the Internet; providing professional consulting services relating to telecommunications | ACTIVE | — |
| 041 | Providing entertainment and educational information in the fields of culture, arts, crafts, music, amusement, sports and leisure provided on-line via computer databases or the Internet; providing electronic game services | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Testing of electronic apparatuses and instruments, namely, telecommunications equipment, and electronic data transmission equipment; providing technical research in the fields of telecommunications, and the Internet; rental of computers; designing the web pages of others through the compilation of designs, drawings and commissioned writings; providing design and technical management plans to others in the field of telecommunications equipment; all the aforesaid excluding computer software development and consulting; providing entertainment and educational information in the field of science | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 6, 2012 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 6, 2012 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 7, 2012 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jan 6, 2012 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Dec 29, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 17, 2011 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| May 16, 2011 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| May 12, 2011 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 30, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2010 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Oct 28, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2010 | EXRA | NOTICE OF APPROVAL OF EXTENSION REQUEST MAILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2010 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 19, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 5, 2010 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 5, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 7, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 14, 2009 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 25, 2009 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 6, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 27, 2009 | ZZAX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE WITHDRAWN-TIMELY AAU | — |
| Feb 13, 2009 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jan 30, 2009 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 27, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Jul 11, 2008 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | ERFR | TEAS REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION RECEIVED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 14, 2007 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jun 22, 2007 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jun 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 8, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 7, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 26, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 27, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 26, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 6, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 11, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 22, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |