USPTO serial 78365254
LUCKY NITES
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TIERNEY, MARGERY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LUCKY NITES?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
White Plains, NY
White Plains, NY
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Martin Schwimmer
MARTIN SCHWIMMER MARTIN SCHWIMMER ESQ7 BAYBERRY DRMT PLEASANT, NY 10570UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | beer; mineral waters, aerated waters, carbonated waters, flavored waters and other non-alcoholic beverages, namely, punches, soft drinks, smoothies and lemonades; sports drinks; energy drinks; isotonic drinks, hypertonic drinks and hypotonic drinks, for use and/or as required by athletes and those engaged in active or stressful sports and activities; fruit juices and fruit drinks, vegetable juices and vegetable drinks; syrups, powders, concentrates and effervescent tablets for making non-alcoholic drinks and beverages; non-alcoholic cocktails and drinks in the nature of soft drinks, non-alcoholic beer, non-alcoholic punches, non-alcoholic cocktail mixes, non-alcoholic malt coolers, non-alcoholic fruit drinks, non-alcoholic wine, non-alcoholic wine cocktails, non-alcoholic liqueurs and non-alcoholic mixed cocktails | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 27, 2006 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 7, 2006 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 17, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 15, 2005 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 25, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Nov 2, 2004 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 13, 2004 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 27, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 25, 2004 | EMRV | EMAIL RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 24, 2004 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 23, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Aug 16, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |