Drawing for CUT THE CORD

USPTO serial 78365341

CUT THE CORD

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MEIER, SHARON A
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 112 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CUT THE CORD?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brendan P. McFeely

BRENDAN P MCFEELY KANE KESSLER PC1350 AVE OF THE AMERICASNEW YORK, NY 10019UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007Tools, namely electric glue guns; shrink-wrapping machinesACTIVEMar 11, 2007
008Electric heated windshield scrapersACTIVEMar 11, 2007
009Personal care appliances, namely electric clothing irons, electric hair curling irons and electric hair straighteners; Travel personal appliances, namely electric clothing irons, electric hair curling irons, and electric hair straighteners; electric powered soldering irons; electric hair crimpers; electric heated hair rollersACTIVEMar 11, 2007
011Household appliances, namely electric water kettles, electric ice cream softening machines, electric electric coffee makers, electric hot plates for cooking, electric shoe dryers, electric space heaters, electric barbeque grills, electric tabletop heaters, and electric snow melters; Personal care appliances, namely hair dryers; electric hand warmers; electric lighters for lighting charcoalsACTIVEMar 11, 2007
021Electric ice cream scoopsACTIVEMar 11, 2007

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2008MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Mar 26, 2008ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 11, 2008DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Aug 27, 2007GNRNNOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 27, 2007CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 23, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
May 30, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
May 30, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 8, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 28, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 28, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jul 29, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 30, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 30, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 21, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 21, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Jun 21, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jun 13, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Jun 3, 2005CWBPWITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION—
Mar 17, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Mar 17, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Mar 9, 2005DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Mar 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Mar 7, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Feb 24, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Feb 24, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 2, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance