USPTO serial 78365663
VOLPINO
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MACIOL II, EUGENE VALENTINE-JO
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 103 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with VOLPINO?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Ft. Lauderdale, FL
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 014 | jewelry and watches Class 014 Precious metals and their alloys in general or indicate specific metals, e;g;, gold, silver and watches as the following items Chronographs for use as watches, Watch faces, Wrist watches, Neck chains, Jewelry, namely crosses, Jewelry, namely amulets, Cloisonne pins, Clip earrings, Bolo ties with precious metal tips, Wristwatches, Wedding bands, Watches containing an electronic game function , Watches, Watch straps, Watch cases, Watch bands, Wall clocks, Semi-precious gemstones, Sculptures made of precious metal, Rings being jewelry, Precious gemstones, Pocket watches, Pins being jewelry, Pins being jewelry, Pearls, Pins being jewelry, Pins being jewelry, Necklaces, Necklaces, Lapel pins jewelry, Jewelry findings, Jewelry findings, Jewelry chains¸ Jewelry cases of precious metal, Jewelry boxes of precious metal, Jewelry , Identification bracelets jewelry, Hat ornaments of precious metal, Emeralds, Earrings, Ear clips, Diamonds, Cuff-links, Costume jewelry, Clocks, Chronometers, Charms, Brooches, Bracelets of precious metal, Bracelets jewelry, Belt buckles of precious metal for clothing, Precious stones, Chokers, Jewelry pins for use on hats, Hat pins of precious metal | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 2004 |
| 025 | footwear and clothing Class 25 in this class the following items regarding clothing and footwear , Wind shirts, Sleep shirts, Shirt fronts, Foulards clothing article, Walking shorts, Denim jackets, Lace boots, Footwear, namely, rubbers, Denim jackets, Rainwear, Wraps clothing, Wedding gowns, Waistcoats, V-neck sweaters, Vested suits, Veils, T-shirts, Trousers, Tops clothing, Top coats, Tights, Ties [clothing], Thongs footwear, Tailleurs, Sweaters, Slacks, Skirts, Shorts, Shoes, Shirts, Shifts clothing, Shawls, Shawls, Sashes, Sandals, Rubbers, Robes, Rainwear, Rain coats, Polo shirts, Parkas, Pantsuits, Pants, Panties, Pajamas, Negligees , Neckties, Moccasins, Miniskirts, Lingerie, Leotards , Leather jackets, Leather coats, Knit shirts, Jerseys clothing, Jeans, Jackets, Gloves, Gloves, Fur jackets, Fur coats, Frocks, Frocks, Evening gowns, Espadrilles, Dresses, Dresses, Cuffs, Cravats, Coverups, Coats, Clogs, Chemises, Chemises, Caps clothing, Capes, Camisoles, Bras, Boots, Boleros, Boas, Blousons, Blazers, Bikinis, Berets, Belts clothing, Beachwear, Bathrobes, Ascots, Anoraks parkas, Short sets clothing, Chemisettes, Capris, Capri pants | ACTIVE | Aug 23, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| May 31, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2005 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 17, 2005 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Dec 17, 2004 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2004 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 13, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 4, 2004 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 24, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2004 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |