CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for THE ULTIMATE BASEMENT

USPTO serial 78365703

THE ULTIMATE BASEMENT

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3084446Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 25, 2006
Examiner
WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with THE ULTIMATE BASEMENT?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Benjamin L. Blaugrund

BENJAMIN L BLAUGRUND HOLLAND & HART LLP555 17TH ST STE 3200, PODENVER, CO 80201-8749UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035RETAIL STORE SERVICES FOR CONSUMER PRODUCTS IN THE FIELD OF ELECTRONICS FEATURING A WIDE VARIETY OF CONSUMER ELECTRONICS FOR THE HOME AND PERSON, EXCLUDING THE RETAIL SALE OF ELECTRONIC DEVICES FOR USE IN COMPUTING AND FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATIONSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 1, 2004
037INSTALLATION, REPAIR AND MAINTENANCE OF CONSUMER HOME ELECTRONICSSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDApr 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 30, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Apr 25, 2006EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Apr 25, 2006R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 8, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 28, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 23, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Nov 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Nov 22, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Nov 16, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Oct 28, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 7, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 27, 2005ATRQATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED—
Sep 23, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 23, 2005EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Sep 23, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 23, 2005EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Sep 22, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 22, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Mar 25, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Mar 24, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Mar 16, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Mar 16, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance