Drawing for BOND GIRL

USPTO serial 78365745

BOND GIRL

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with BOND GIRL?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael B Moore

Debi Coleman-Dabbs Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios Inc.245 N. Beverly DriveBeverly Hills, CA 90210UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Soaps for body care and personal use; perfumery, cosmetics, hair lotionsACTIVE
025Clothing, namely, shirts, beachwear, T-shirts, tank tops, baseball caps, hats, jackets, coats, hooded sweatshirts, sweatshirts, sweaters, fleece pullovers, underwear, boxers, robes, scarves, gloves, jumpers, and headwearACTIVE
028Action figure toys and accessories therefor; board games; action figures; hobby craft doll and figurine kits; children's multiple activity toys; battery-operated action toys; dolls and accessories therefor; musical toys; toy cars, trucks and other toy vehicles; and model carsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (ARAA): This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 26, 2012ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 26, 2012REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Aug 6, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Aug 6, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 25, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Sep 12, 2007EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Sep 12, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Mar 13, 2007NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 19, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 29, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Oct 30, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Oct 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 19, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 19, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Oct 12, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Oct 12, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Mar 30, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Sep 30, 2005RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED
Mar 30, 2005GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED
Mar 30, 2005CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN
Mar 11, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED
Mar 3, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 3, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 4, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 4, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance