USPTO serial 78365774
BE COUTURE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- FRYE, KIMBERLY
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 113 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with BE COUTURE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gary S. Phillips
GARY S PHILLIPS LAW OFFICES OF GARY S PHILLIPS9401 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 1100BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90212-2924UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Cosmetics, namely, perfume, perfume spray, body powder, body lotion, toilet water, and toilet water spray; makeup, namely, foundation, eye shadow, lip gloss, lipstick, mascara, eye liner, and blush; hair and skin preparations, namely, hair spray, bath gels, facial cleansers, deodorant soap, shampoo, conditioner, and shaving cream; astringents for cosmetic purposes, beauty masks, facial scrubs, skin cleansers, cosmetic compacts, night cream, skin cream, eye cream, eye makeup remover, eye pencils, eye shadow, eyebrow pencils, eyeliners, face powder, moisturizers, clarifiers, skin emollients, skin toners, and body splash | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Fine and costume jewelry, namely, pins, brooches, rings, bracelets, anklets, armbands, necklaces, and chokers made of or incorporating precious stones or semiprecious stones, clocks, wristwatches | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Handbags, purses, briefcases, wallets, luggage, coin cases, and cosmetic cases sold empty | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Clothing, namely, shirts, blouses, T-shirts, tanktops, pants, jeans, shorts, skirts, jumpers, overalls, sweaters, jackets, coats, sweat pants, sweat shirts, underpants, bras, slips, swimsuits, swimsuit coverups, pajamas, lingerie, socks, leggings, stockings, shoes, sandals, boots, mufflers, caps and hats | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by KNOWLES, BEYONCE'
- Other trademarks owned by KNOWLES, TINA
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Similar marks named BE COUTURE
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 24, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Aug 23, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 31, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 23, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 1, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |