CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for DOWNPLUS

USPTO serial 78365814

DOWNPLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
TAYLOR, DAVID T
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with DOWNPLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sonoo Otsu

Sonoo Otsu Pacific Law Group LLP100 Century Center Ct., Suite 415San Jose, CA 95112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
020PillowACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 2, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 2, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 22, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Sep 22, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Sep 15, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Sep 15, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Sep 15, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 2, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 2, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 3, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
May 9, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Mar 28, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Mar 28, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 19, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 27, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 27, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 15, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 3, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Jul 4, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Jul 3, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Dec 8, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Dec 8, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Dec 8, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 2, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Aug 1, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 1, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Jul 3, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jul 3, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Jul 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 3, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 30, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jun 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 16, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 10, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 10, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 9, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Dec 2, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 2, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Nov 2, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 7, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 7, 2004TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 1, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004CNRTSU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance