CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for BOY LONDON

USPTO serial 78365841

BOY LONDON

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3488600Status 790Registered
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 19, 2008
Examiner
SWAIN, MICHELE LYNN
Law office
GENERIC WEB UPDATE

What this means

This trademark is registered with the USPTO. Monitoring new filings can help you catch lookalike marks early.

Need help with BOY LONDON?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GI NAM LEE

GI NAM LEE TRUSTABLE LAW PC8306 WILSHIRE BLVD STE 941BEVERLY HILLS, CA 90211UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
014wristwatches and jewelryACTIVEMay 31, 1981
018billfolds and handbagsACTIVEMay 31, 1981
025men's clothing, namely, suits, jackets,shirts, pants, scarves, shorts, T-shirts, belts, ties and shoes, ladies clothing, namely, suits, jackets, pants, shirts, skirts, scarves, shorts, T-shirts, jumpsuits, belts and shoesACTIVEMay 31, 1981

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 14, 2025PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Feb 28, 2024TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2024ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 28, 2024REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2024CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Feb 28, 2024COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Jul 21, 2021TMBNTTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS—
Jul 21, 2021CANTCANCELLATION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Jul 21, 2021CANDCANCELLATION DENIED NO. 999999—
Dec 28, 2020PETCCANCELLATION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 18, 2019TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 28, 2018NA89NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 9 - MAILED—
Aug 28, 2018RNL1REGISTERED AND RENEWED (FIRST RENEWAL - 10 YRS)The trademark registration was renewed for another 10-year term after acceptable maintenance filings. RNL1, RNL2, and RNL3 indicate which renewal cycle (first, second, or third 10-year term) was recorded. The registration remains active.
Aug 28, 201889AGREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (10-YR) ACCEPTED/SEC. 9 GRANTEDThe USPTO accepted your combined Section 8 declaration and Section 9 renewal application. The registration is renewed for another 10-year term. The next combined maintenance filing will be due at the following 10-year anniversary.
Aug 28, 2018APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 20, 2018E89RTEAS SECTION 8 & 9 RECEIVED—
Aug 20, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 13, 2018TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2017REM2COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014NA85NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED—
Nov 6, 2014C15AREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK.—
Oct 29, 2014EROPTEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION-POST REG RECEIVED—
Sep 3, 2014PR23POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15—
Sep 3, 2014APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 18, 2014E815TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED—
Jan 15, 2014ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 10, 2011ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Mar 3, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 15, 2008TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Aug 19, 2008R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jun 3, 2008PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
May 14, 2008NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
May 1, 2008PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 1, 2008CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Apr 24, 2008DMCCDATA MODIFICATION COMPLETED—
Apr 3, 2008TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Apr 3, 2008CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Apr 3, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 30, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 21, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Nov 8, 2007TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 8, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Nov 8, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Sep 25, 2007UNDCUNDELIVERABLE MAIL - COURTESY COPY MAILED—
Sep 17, 2007MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 17, 2007ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 29, 2007GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 29, 2007CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jul 17, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jan 17, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Jan 17, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Nov 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Nov 17, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
May 27, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 27, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
May 18, 2005PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
May 18, 2005PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
May 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2005MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Apr 19, 2005ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Sep 15, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 15, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 1, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance