Drawing for CALL-N-SWITCH

USPTO serial 78366150

CALL-N-SWITCH

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VALLILLO, MELISSA C
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CALL-N-SWITCH?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

John Smith-Hill

JOHN SMITH-HILL SMITH-HILL & BEDELL PC16100 NW CORNELL RD STE 220BEAVERTON, OR 97006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009telephone apparatus; corded telephones; cordless telephones; internet telephones; telephone answering apparatus; telephone answering machines; caller identification boxes for telephones; telephone call monitoring apparatus, namely, apparatus for monitoring telephone calls and operating electrical appliances in response to such calls; apparatus for use in remote control, namely, apparatus for receiving telephone calls and operating electrical appliances in response to such calls; electrical controllers for remote control of appliances by telephone communication; radio transmitters and receivers for remote controls, radio controlsACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 5, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 5, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 21, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Aug 29, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Aug 9, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Jul 5, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Jun 15, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
May 30, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
May 30, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
May 30, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
May 30, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Oct 12, 2005GRMLCORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED
Oct 12, 2005CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 26, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Sep 20, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Sep 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Sep 15, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 15, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Jul 27, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED
Apr 18, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Apr 18, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Mar 28, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Mar 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Mar 15, 2005FAXXFAX RECEIVED
Sep 19, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 19, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 2, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 23, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance