USPTO serial 78366210
SRS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3323817Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 30, 2007
- Examiner
- BROMAGHIM, PETER
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 107
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with SRS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
CALABASAS, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Santa Ana, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Craig Fischer
Craig Fischer DTS LLC5220 Las Virgenes RoadLegal DepartmentCalabasas, CA 91302Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Audio processors for improving the clarity and/or intelligibility of music and speech or the spoken work; encoders and decoders for use in processing audio electronic signals to create an enhanced audio image from playback of the audio signals through speakers; encoders and decoders for use in processing and/or recording analog and/or digital electronic signals for use in the audio and/or audio-visual fields; encoders and decoders for use in processing audio electronic signals to encode multi-track audio information into a limited number of audio tracks, and to decode a limited number of audio tracks into multi-track audio, or surround sound audio information; electronic and electrical apparatus for the recording, storage, transmission and/or reproduction of audio, visual, or audio-visual data; multi-channel sound processors; video monitors; stereo receivers and amplifiers; tape decks; car stereos; televisions; portable stereos; stereo processors for use in cinemas; video disc playback and/or recording apparatus; audio playback and/or recording apparatus; home audio-visual recorders; karaoke players; Digital versatile disc playback and/or recording devices; VCRs; speakers; Compact disc playback and/or recording devices; video game cartridges and/or tapes; cable television receivers and decoders; satellite television receivers and decoders; remote control units for these goods; telephones, portable phones, cellular phones; computer programs featuring sound generating capability; computer software for improving the clarity and/or intelligibility of speech or music; computer software for expanding an audio image generated by speakers for use in the entertainment field; computers; computer audio processing circuitry; computer game equipment, namely, software and discs; computer hardware, namely, computer floppy disks, hard discs, CD-ROM discs, mini discs, digital video discs, optical storage discs, magnetic tape, firmware and computer solid-state cartridges; CD-ROM playback and/or recording apparatus; audio and/or audio-visual prerecorded media containing entertainment material in the form of the spoken word, music and other sounds, namely, motion picture film, VCR cassette tapes, laser discs, video discs, compact discs, optical discs, analog or digital audio cassette tapes and analog or digital video cassette tapes; encoders and decoders for use in processing audio electronic signals consisting primarily of speech to improve intelligibility and/or clarity; integrated circuits; video tuners; boomboxes; laser disc players and records featuring music and spoken word; digital video tape players; digital video disc players; speaker systems containing a sound transducer and an integral amplifier; motion picture projectors; computer sound processing cards; industry standard computer interface cards; audio and/or audio-visual recordings stored on magnetic tape or optical media featuring entertainment material such as music or movies; computer programs for supporting sound generating capabilities in personal computers; cellular reception and transmission equipment, namely, cellular telephones, audio processing circuitry for cellular telephones, microphones, conference speakers, public address speakers, public address audio processors, public address systems, hearing aid devices, intercom systems, headphones, radios, walkie-talkies, CBs, answering machines, digital amplifiers, and computer software for voice and speech recognition; outdoor speakers; computer pcmcia cards; electronic signal processor enabling improved acoustic spacial imaging and dynamics; professional and amateur sound enhancing apparatus, namely, professional audio processors; surround sound decoders | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 1, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jun 5, 2017 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 5, 2017 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 30, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Nov 14, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Oct 29, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 30, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 14, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 25, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 7, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 4, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 27, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Nov 24, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Oct 28, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 10, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 4, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 18, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 7, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 2, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 3, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |