USPTO serial 78366311
METHOD IQ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- BAKER, JORDAN A
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with METHOD IQ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Frank S. Benjamin
FRANK S BENJAMIN MCKENNA LONG & ALDRIDGE LLP303 PEACHTREE ST NE STE 5300ATLANTA, GA 30308UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Outsourcing in the fields of telephone call centers, customer contact centers and computer systems; independent sales representatives in the field of software, computer hardware and telephony systems; retail services by direct solicitation by sales agents in the field of software, computer hardware and telephony systems; licensing of computer software | ACTIVE | May 15, 2002 |
| 038 | Telecommunications consultation | ACTIVE | May 15, 2002 |
| 042 | Computer software consultation, development and design for others; consulting services in the field of design, selection, implementation and use of computer hardware and software systems for others; technical consultation, namely, consulting with others about the computer software involved in telephony, telephone call centers and customer contact centers; customization of computer hardware and software; integration of computer systems and networks; custom design and engineering of telephony systems; maintenance and repair of computer software; technical support services, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; application service provider (ASP), namely, hosting computer software applications of others; computer services, namely, acting as an application service provider by hosting the computer software applications of others in the field of knowledge management, namely, hosting the computer software applications of others for the collection, editing, organizing, modifying, transmission, storage, searching,retrieval and sharing of data and information | ACTIVE | May 15, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 28, 2008 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 28, 2008 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 23, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Nov 21, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 10, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Apr 29, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Sep 25, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 14, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 16, 2004 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 16, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |