USPTO serial 78366552
MASTER GRILL FOODS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- AWRICH, ELLEN
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with MASTER GRILL FOODS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | meat and poultry | ABANDONED | Feb 5, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 14, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Nov 14, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 12, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Sep 22, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 23, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 3, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 25, 2005 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | ATRQ | ATTORNEY REVIEW/DECISION ON AMENDMENT REQUIRED | — |
| Jun 27, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 27, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 23, 2004 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 22, 2004 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 21, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 2, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 24, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |