Drawing for QUIK BREAK APART

USPTO serial 78367055

QUIK BREAK APART

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 605
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
KIM, SOPHIA SUJIN
Law office
PRE-PUBLICATION FINAL REVIEW

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with QUIK BREAK APART?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Kenneth C. Hill

KENNETH C HILL HILL & HUNN LLP201 MAIN ST STE 1440FORT WORTH, TX 76102UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Frozen and processed, beef, chicken and porkABANDONED

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 17, 2005ABN5ABANDONMENT - AFTER PUBLICATION
Feb 17, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED
Feb 9, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Feb 7, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Jan 3, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Dec 29, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Dec 29, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Dec 29, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Dec 29, 2004ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN
Nov 19, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Nov 8, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Oct 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Oct 19, 2004GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED
Oct 19, 2004CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Sep 7, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 7, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 3, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Feb 25, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance