USPTO serial 78367074
RAPADEMICS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- PENDLETON, CAROLYN A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with RAPADEMICS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daynel L. Hooker, Esq.
DAYNEL L HOOKER ESQ J POWE LAW FIRM LLC5340 S QUEBEC STE 365NGREENWOOD VILLAGE, CO 80111UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Sound recordings, namely, CDs, DVDs, cassettes, records and videos featuring educational subject matter, namely, phonics, math, life skills, life philosophies and positive messages by integrating rap with academics | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 18, 2005 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| May 2, 2005 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 19, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 18, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 9, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 3, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Feb 25, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |