USPTO serial 78367322
EDDIE RODRIGUEZ
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RADEMACHER, MARK A
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EDDIE RODRIGUEZ?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Thomas W. Brooke
THOMAS W BROOKE HOLLAND & KNIGHT LLP2099 PENNSYLVANIA AVE NW STE 100WASHINGTON, DC 20006UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Men's and women's perfumes and cosmetics; cosmetics, namely face and body moisturizers, tonics, creams, and lotions; sun tan and sun block lotions and creams, lipsticks, eye shadows, coloring pencils, mascara, blush, face powder, foundations; nail polish; hair lotions; shaving cream, shaving foam, shaving gel, shaving lotion; dentifrices, cosmetic balls and pads | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Stationery articles, namely, address books and notebooks, envelopes, calendars; writing and marking instruments, namely, fountain pens, ballpoint pens, felt-tipped pens and roller pens, markers, high lighters, pencils and lead pencils and refills for pens | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Furniture, outdoor and indoor furniture | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Carpets, reeds mats; textile mats for use in the home; linoleum for use on floor; hard surface coverings for floors; wallpaper and decorative wallpaper borders | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Rodriguez, Eduardo
- Other trademarks owned by Rodriguez, Eduardo
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Similar marks named EDDIE RODRIGUEZ
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 12, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Sep 5, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Aug 16, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 9, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 5, 2006 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 4, 2005 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 20, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 20, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CWBP | WITHDRAWN BEFORE PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 30, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 25, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 23, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 9, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 17, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 15, 2004 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 10, 2004 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 8, 2004 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 18, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 24, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 7, 2004 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Sep 3, 2004 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 10, 2004 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |