CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MUD BUSTERS

USPTO serial 78367576

MUD BUSTERS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3276155Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Aug 7, 2007
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with MUD BUSTERS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Steven H. Akre

STEVEN H AKRE STEVEN H AKRE PCPO BOX 11525SAINT LOUIS, MO 63105UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Automobile cleaning and car washingSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJun 1, 2004

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Mar 14, 2014C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Aug 7, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jul 3, 2007REGVLAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 3, 2007ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 30, 2007CNPRALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED—
May 24, 2007SUPCSTATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Apr 17, 2007PGSUPETITION GRANTED - SOU FILED—
Apr 17, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Apr 17, 2007APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Feb 20, 2007IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Feb 20, 2007PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Feb 20, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 12, 2006EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 12, 2006EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Sep 1, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Aug 11, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Aug 11, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Jun 13, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 13, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Apr 12, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Feb 8, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2006TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 17, 2006PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 17, 2006PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 13, 2005MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 13, 2005ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 12, 2005EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Apr 12, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jan 18, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Dec 29, 2004NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Nov 17, 2004PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Nov 17, 2004ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 27, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 26, 2004CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 25, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 18, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 18, 2004FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 6, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 30, 2004GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 30, 2004CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Sep 29, 2004ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 14, 2004CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 5, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 5, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 26, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance